It has been a busy month and I realize I haven’t been regular with my blogging. While researching some equipment for my studio business, I looked on my blog for some updates to the blog I maintain for my business and realized as I was toggling around that I have over 100 blog entries that are in my drafts folder. I had forgotten just how many pieces I have in there. Most are only partly written, others are finished pieces. Some are finished but don’t feel finished. Anyway, I think you get the drift. So tonight, I am putting up a draft and for the next few weeks as I feel the crush of a busy production season in my business, I will release the hounds….uh…the drafts!
Enjoy! (Ha! Not really, right?)
(From January 2018)
You will notice that I don’t discuss much on the subject of world events, geopolitical subjects, or get too political. I don’t do this in large part because it is such a lost cause. I know I wont convince anyone of anything they themselves do not want to first consider themselves. For the most part, I do a good job of doing that. When it comes to my adventures in awakened consciousness, I like very much to report what I have found much like an explorer might, offering up glimmering pearls and telling others just where I found them so they can go hunting for their own. This forms the bulk of my philosophy about what I do here. I know it may not be as exciting as writing about the dramas of outer life or the deceptions that exist in our perceptions…
I do think, though, that awakening involves a radical inner process of seeking to finally tie together the opposites within consciousness in order to effect the atom bomb explosion that is the rising of cosmic consciousness. Further, I think that this radical awareness (or its potential awareness, I should say) goes hand in hand with the way we perceive the world. That perception, I will simply state, is the no-bullshit version of events, or the unmanipulated version of events.
9/11 was one such manipulated event and I am going to tell you why I think that this is so. I say this because if millions of people can be duped in the way they were duped on 9/11,then those who are doing the duping will continue to dupe people because of how easy it is to do. The conditions simply need to be an authority that is trusted explicitly by the People. That is all. So this authority is groomed, conditioned, and placed daily in front of the People in order to condition every mind to accept the impeachable trust that should be placed in the authority. While we do this with government, we also do this with media and media is the force that really goes to town on forging and shaping our opinions. As a result, media is used as the single most powerful propaganda tool the world has ever seen. This is why, in mid-last century the U.S. C.I.A. was heavily involved in meshing itself with media outlets (every major media outlet was known to have a CIA operative working in its ranks—this was admitted by a past CIA Director in a Congressional hearing).
Along with this effort to have an agent in every major media outlet (I dont cite a source because the heads of the C.I.A. admitted on the record that they have been doing this for a long time) has come projects like “Mockingbird” which was an effort to sway public opinion and manufacture consent in much the way that Herman and Chomsky has described it. If you want a war, the easiest way is to find ways to get the People behind it, and the C.I.A. found that propaganda was the best tool. In essence, they lied and manipulated the public by telling us that there was a threat and then saying that our way of life is being threatened and that we must fight this threat or else we will lose everything we cherish. this has been done a number of times by our government in order to press us into war or to invade other countries (our entry into World War II was hastened by Pearl Harbor which was an event that our leaders knew about in advance and did nothing to stop it as was our entry into Vietnam with the Gulf of Tomkin Incident which is now known was a false flag operation intended to lie us into war in Vietnam).
The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country. —-Hermann Göring
What we now know is that our own C.I.A. has used propaganda in order to depose countless democratically elected presidents and heads of State through the careful use of propaganda. This was done in order that more suitable and more U.S. friendly leaders might be installed who might do business with our largest and most wealthy corporations. There are other interests, too, which are the arms dealers, who stand to profit when we are at war. This was why the Cold War was sold so well and made so many so incredibly wealthy. It never involved firing a shot, but it involved being ready to fire the shot if we had to, which meant some of the most expensive munitions the world has known- nuclear warheads). Remember that it was Eisenhower who warned on his last public address about this powerful threat and how it might actually take over a government from the inside.
To better understand this force and what it has done around the world, it is helpful to see the list of countries that have been effected by the meddling of our C.I.A. in this short and to the point article. It’s useful to understand that the CIA, while tasked with only foreign efforts, has in truth been covertly engaging in propaganda wars against its own people for the benefit of those who get to hide behind the veil of secrecy granted to our CIA and other intelligence apparatus’s.
You might wonder why I am bringing up the CIA in relation to 9/11 and I respond by explaining that while I do not yet know fully who scripted the 9/11 narrative, it has all the marks of our CIA or similar thinking attached to it. It is what is commonly called by the CIA a Psyop. A psyop is an effort to use ones authority to sway people to your way of thought, perhaps also through other forms of manipulation like trauma-induced mind control of the kind that involves seeing people murdered or who die in terrible conditions. There was a lot of this taking place on 9/11 and when you begin to think more critically, you can begin going through the footage taken on that day to spot the people who were following the narrative despite the fact that the 9/11 story isn’t supported by the facts. That is really the lynch pin here, which is that 9/11 is filled with numerous impossibilities which have all been presented to the public as proof that the propaganda story of 9/11 is true. I will list these stories presented to the American People as proof that 9/11 was carried out by jihadists wanting to strike a blow at American power in the West.
Airplanes brought down the Twin Towers
The single biggest problem with this idea presented to the public on the very day of the event (without careful review or waiting for evidence to be loomed at more closely) is that in 9/11 building #7 fell perfectly into its footprint without ever having been struck by a plane. The problem here is that tower #7 fell in the same way that tower 1 & 2 fell, which were all at free fall speed, directly onto their footprints.
The problem here has to do with physics. If I weaken a tree trunk on one side I will expect that tree to fall in the direction of the weakened side. If a house or building like a skyscraper is weakened along one side, which both of the towers were, we would have expected to see a tumble, a leaning and a falling over in the direction of the injury. To make a building fall straight down would require the removal of structural members’ support through the building in order to initiate a collapse.
The problem with tower 7 is numerous: Silverstein, who owned the buildings famously told PBS in an interview the day after 9/11 that he had decided to “pull” the building in order to bring it to the ground after isolated fires burned in the structure. Silverstein has since back pedaled saying he did not mean “pull” in the way that all owners of buildings use the term, which is planned demolition, but rather some other meaning. Further, there were multiple eyewitness accounts of people who heard a countdown coming through the firefighters radios prior to building 7 coming down, followed with a series of rapid burst explosions, which were consistent with planned demolition. This eyewitness testimony explains how Tower 7 came down after a countdown followed by a series of explosions.
This eyewitness heard the same thing. He explains how he also saw molten metal in the pile, something that could not be possible as a result of jet fuel, which is essentially kerosene in its level of heat and flammability.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nQrpLp-X0ws
Explosions Before Planes Struck The Tower
One big problem with the narrative as given is a discrepancy in timing between planes hitting buildings and explosions that took place before planes actually hit. Watch this video of one such prominent witness who witnessed these pre-strike explosions take place.
Here is another video detailing the same exact situation of explosions before any plane had struck the building, with explosions coming out of, witnesses believe, elevators, explosions so strong that they broke out the windows of the World Trade Center building, glass that was two inches thick! Imagine trying to break two-inch glass with nothing but a percussive sound wave. This force was strong enough to push a person in the building out into the street. This was incredibly strong explosions. Bear in mind, there were no kitchens where there were tanks of gas or gas lines. The kitchens were all electric.
The Presence of Incendiaries That Cannot Be Traced
The speed with which the debris was removed from downtown was unprecedented. Mayor at that time, Rudy Guilliani, made sure that trucks were fitted with GPS tracking to make sure that no truck deviated from their course to deliver to barges for sale to China. One driver described how he was fired after he stopped his truck along the route one time on his way to the delivery location. This made examination of the debris for forensic clues difficult. However, some debris was collected by individuals that made it into the hands of capable investigators who examined the rubble and found evidence of an untraceable incendiary scattered throughout the debris. Thermite is not traceable because of how easy it is to manufacture. All other explosives, including nuclear materials, all have tags that allow forensic investigators to be able to trace the materials back to their manufacturer. Nuclear explosions put off a radio signal unique to the lab that made the material. Dynamite has material in it that is a taggant that allows it to be traced back to its maker, the same also applies to plastic explosives. When it comes to thermite, all bets are off, though. Anyone can make it. In fact, in 2003, I made my own sample of thermite in my studio in order to see first-hand how powerful this material really is. I can say that given that I made only a pinch (if you cook you know how small this amount is) and the resulting reaction once I lit the material was like a powerful flashbulb going off in front of me. Where the thermite was held, the metal began to melt. Because the reaction only took place for a couple of seconds, not enough heat was produced for a long enough time to completely melt the steel plate it was placed on. However, if this reaction was allowed to continue for ten to twenty seconds, there was no question in my mind that this material had the power to vaporize, not just melt, steel. No one should attempt such an experiment unless under careful controlled conditions!
Here is Steven Jones explaining what he found in the debris from one of the towers in NYC:
Put Options Placed On American Airlines Stock
When you trade stock and you believe that a stock is going to go down in price, you will essentially buy a contract that gives you the right to buy stock from someone who actually holds that stock, at the lower price. This is called a “put” which is a type of option contract that stock brokers and investors use to make money. In the weeks prior to 9/11 there was unusually high trading volume in these puts on American Airlines. The result was that huge sums were made on a bet that the airline stock would go down suddenly in price. When you dig into the world of airline stock, it becomes clear that absent knowledge of something that might increase the price of airline tickets, for example (gas price spike, or an inability to manufacture enough planes or a worker strike) that there are few other elements in the world that would seriously impact the price of an airline stock. As a result, an investigation was launched and it was found that the stock was traced back to a former top C.I.A. administrator whose company (which was often tied to money laundering for its clients) was involved in this very shady deal.
For the details on this, here is one source that explains those: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/illegaltades.html
Engineers For 911 Truth Explain The Science Behind What Happened: It Doesn’t Add Up
Architects and engineers have come forward to explain that what took place three times on 9/11 was itself a structural impossibility without the aid of accelerants or explosives. They explain that while there has never been a collapse of steel frame buildings from fire, there has never been symmetrical collapses either. A symmetrical collapse happens when you weaken all of the supporting columns in a building at once. But the buildings were not struck by a plane that way. The two of the three buildings that fell on 9/11 did so were each struck on one side, which would create an asymmetrical collapse instead of a symetrical one. If the buildings had done what engineers and architects know is the case with the buildings that day, we should have seen buildings toppling over, probably even falling over onto other nearby buildings. There are a lot of examples of video showing asymmetrical failures of buildings and what they look like. Most tall sky scrapers do not fail this way because they are built to withstand forces that would act on them to cause them to fail. The twi towers were designed to take a direct hit from a fully loaded passenger jet, the largest at the time of its building, and still stand.
Pilots For 9/11 Truth Explain Impossible Speeds And Maneuvers Of Planes
On 9/11 the plane that struck the Pentagon executed a maneuver described by seasoned pilots as impossible to do for an airline student whose skills were marginal at best. In fact, when seasoned airline pilots tried to execute the same maneuver using simulators, they were unable to perform the maneuver. What does this mean? It means that the plane was engineered for tighter turns, may have been remotely controlled (which planes do have) or this was done by someone like a fighter pilot, for example. Additionally, the Pilots for 9/11 Truth explain that the planes on 9/11 were operating over their maximum engineered speeds. Exceeding these speeds can lead to tails being ripped off, for example, resulting in a loss of control over the airplane.
Phone Calls From Altitude Not Possible Until 2003
C phone calls were not possible at the time of the attacks on 9/11 while at altitude. Only by 2003 were more powerful cell phone towers put in place that could allow for higher altitude calls to be made from phones. Period.
Communications Inconsistent With a Plane That Is In The Air
I find this one to be of special interest because of how sharp the woman who discovered this one was to pick up the details that she did post-9/11. Rebecca Roth, who is a veteran airline stewardess, pulled back the veil on communications with flight crew aboard one of the planes that was allegedly hijacked on 9/11. She found a narrative that was consistent with an airplane that was not at altitude and was actually on the ground, parked, and depressurized. Roth came to these discoveries after stumbling across news reports that showed that most of the men who were listed were actually still alive in Saudi Arabia and some were, and still are, airline pilots. To hear Roth’s interview click on the youtube below. Also, there are longer interviews with her on the subject on youtube that are well worth the listen as well.
These are what I would consider some of the biggest issues surrounding 9/11 that help explain why what we were told did not fit what the evidence reveals. It shows that someone wanted 9/11 to be seen as a hijack event in order to justify a war in the Middle East and to take away our precious rights granted by our Constitution and our Bill Of Rights.
No Video Showing What Struck The Pentagon
I know; we have five frames of “video” now of the object that struck the Pentagon. Bear in mind that the Pentagon was ringed with video cameras and was one of the most surveiled and secured facilities in the world and only five frames are shown. All other tapes were confiscated by the FBI.
Hole In Pentagon Inconsistent With A Boeing 747
How do you explain to someone that an object traveling at nearly 500 miles per hour does not make a hole in stone and steel that is smaller than it is? We see this at the Pentagon; the hole made in the side of the building was too small for a 747. Further, there were NO marks whatsoever on the building from the wings or the tail, which was tall enough to have reached all the way to the top of the Pentagon building itself. Photographs right after the explosion reveals no debris on the grass lawn, but debris appears later, which is picked up by bystanders. This has all the makings of a coverup.
Strange Anomalies Suggest Esoteric Technology
One of the biggest stories of 9/11 was the existence of extremely strange phenomenon that centers around objects like steel girders seen turning into dust and also evaporating. When I heard about this I thought it was something on the far fringe but as it turns out, there is solid evidence showing that something really strange took place on 9/11. When do pieces of steel evaporate into dust as we watch them on video? This video begins to explain the energy effects that took place on that day (cars that burst into fire even though there were many sheets of paper surrounding them that did not burst into fire, tritium levels many times too high in the water in the basement of the towers to be accidental). One of the biggest pieces of evidence was how a fireman was walking amidst the debris soon after the tower fell and there were vehicles that were parked at street level next to the building without there being a huge debris pile. Judy Wood points out the uncomfortable facts about how vast amounts of material disappeared and did not create a huge debris pile at all.
Judy Wood goes on to explain the strange anomalies related to what she describes as an energetic event. She gets deep into this around minute 10 in the following video. She also shows up on Beyond Belief with George Noory on Gaia to explain this, should you have a subscription. This video helps you to understand how so much of the rubble simply disappeared and that this was observed by Peter Jennings, among others.
9/11 is believed by many to have been a psychological operation whose purpose was to effect numerous goals, chief among them was the carving up of the middle east through war and invasions as well as the destruction of evidence for ongoing federal investigations that were housed in building #7. 9/11 hastened the weakening of personal freedoms here in the U.S. through the Patriot Act, the effective end of the Posse Comitatus Act, to name a few. Through fear and terror, minds and hearts were forever changed in the U.S. This was done in the worst way imaginable. it has shown the world that the best way to make a difference is to do so through violence instead of through peace and justice.
I know these issues \are both controversial and uncomfortable. I also know that for people I know who believe in the official view about 9/11 these issues are hard to swallow. I have friends who are simply unable to even begin to entertain the problems related to 9/11 because they cannot believe that people could be so evil and that they could be pulling the levers of power. What I have to remind people is that it only take a few evil people to effect these kinds of events, people well-placed who can make sure that NORAD was shut down and so that jets that were scrambled would be routed away from NYC instead of intercepting planes or for breaches of protected airspace around Washington D.C. (something that resulted in 64 jets being scrambled in the year previous to 9/11 all without any problems in getting the jets off the ground and escorting the wayward planes away from the restricted airspace of Washington D.C.). People don’t like the idea of living in a world like this, so it is easier to shut out the possibility that all is not as we have been told. What I can say is that by questioning authority, both of government and our media, or by looking within, we can open ourselves up to a higher form of discernment. There is much about 9/11 that is strange, that does not fit reason and physics and there is a reason why this is so. For this reason, 9/11 was a war on consciousness. It was intended to create fear and to cause us to call upon our leaders to whatever it takes to exact revenge on those who did this to us, or to protect us by dissolving our most previous of Constitutional rights. Let’s not let 9/11 continue its legacy…let’s seek to roll back the Patriot Act and the harm it has done to our freedom which is now more precious than ever before.
Wow, what a post! I hope your other drafts are like this. A fantastic piece of writing, in my view.
I especially like what you have succeeded in doing so clearly and succinctly, and what I always struggle to express. It is in your first two paragraphs: how ‘inner awakening’ is related to awakening about events in the outer world. How the two are inextricably linked. Maybe one is not complete without the other: two sides of the one coin.
There are plenty of folk out there who say they have woken up to how ‘world events as related by leading media channels’ is a partial, distorted, sometimes just plain untrue, version of reality. In my experience, such people often remain mired in hate, paranoia, rancour, and easily end up depressed. The opposites stay well and truly poles apart in their inner life. Their ‘awakening’ is extraordinarily one-sided.
Conversely there are some, like some of my old Buddhist buddies, who have done a good deal of inner work (to varying degrees of effectiveness), but are resistant, even hostile, to peeking below the surface of what they have been told by world presidents and the BBC (I’m in the UK……).
After practising meditation, shamanic journeying, yoga, for a couple of decades or more, I began to see that ‘all is not as it appears’ with regard to world events. Sometimes, at any rate. I knew that I needed to incorporate this realisation into my world view, without it just dragging me down into despondency. A few of my friendships were sorely tested during this period, but there we go….
Then, when kundalini began to truly wake up within my body, around 15 months ago, this was another push towards honesty, authenticity. This is what kundalini seems to insist on, and she isn’t too bothered if you lose your job, your money, your friends in the process! Remove the veils, throw off the distortions, allow reality clear passage. It may be uncomfortable, but the alternative is, well, unthinkable…. With courage success is assured, I suspect, even if ‘success’ comes in a very different shape to what you once imagined it.
So, thanks again for your synthesis of apparently disparate bits of reality. I am grateful.
I’m glad you connected with the piece, ianinverness. I realized after I published it that it wasn’t completely finished, with words not completely spelled or bits missing. Woops! Being so busy lately with other things in life, I just didn’t give this draft the attention it needed. I’ll try to rectify that this week.
One of the hardest things for us to realize is when we have allowed ourselves to become captives of our own beliefs. One such belief people hold is that government would do us no wrong. Sure, we know there is corruption and leaders who are power hungry and swayed by money instead of conscience, but what I have found is it goes much deeper than that. This isn’t what people know or want to believe. They want to remain comfortable and unwittingly will participate in a belief that helps make them feel comfortable. A part of this is ignoring the possibility that events like 911 or the London Tube bombing was nothing more than terrorists. They can’t imagine that it could have been a false flag or an effort to cover up something more evil. Even when we have insiders telling us how they saw a false flag happening in operation, people still refuse to hear and heed.
I sat with friends from school who came out to make glass in my studio recently and the topic turned to deception, government, and similar themes. We wound up in a discussion on 9/11. I explained why I didn’t buy the official narrative. It was interesting to see how there really wasn’t a moment where my friends took what I was explaining and pondered it…at all. For example, the explosion in the basement before a plane hit. This was witnessed by multiple people. One man was burned over 90% if his body. Hello?
Or how about Building number seven, which was never struck by a plane and only had office fires (office fires have never been capable of making steel buildings to fail…and there are many notable examples over many years attesting to this fact)? There was a moment of silence from my friends and then one of them went right back to her position trying to deny there was anything untoward while my other friend actually began developing a stomach ache. If that isn’t repressed emotion and energy, I don’t know what is. Most people won’t ever get past how it makes their guts feel instead of taking that cognitive leap where they say “Okay, let’s pretend this,was a false flag—show me the evidence.” When I explained none of the phone calls could have been made because NO calls could be made at altitude like they were purported to have done, my friend said, “Maybe this was when they were still flying low enough for the cell towers to puck up their calls…” Even then, she tried valiantly to hold onto a belief that these xalls,were exactly what they appeared to be; calls from the hostages aboard the flights that would slam into the twin towers. It’s hard to get to that place that says the plane had been landed, the calls were staged, and who knows what really happened to those poor people. It’s just asking to much.
But if you awoke and peered into the soul of the world and saw massive deception happening at multiple levels and then unravel evidence in events like these and others, it’s a shock but it fits what I saw in the,early days of my inner perceptions when I would read this “soul.” I’m glad I did because it actually has helped me to know what is what. 9/11 though is just scratching the surface. There is a whole ecosystem built on deception and secrecy involving advanced technology reverse engineered from crashed discs if ET origin that gas fueled a highly secretive program largely run by the U.S. but that is being shared with most nations who remain secretive and who agree to the terms as laid out by the U.S.
For as crazy as all of this sounds, it forms the basis of a,post I’m considering putting out there about it. Like 9/11 It is every bit as hard to swallow.
It’s a cold rainy day and I’m finding myself yammering instead of getting back to work! I’m glad it touched a nerve and here’s to questioning things!
I’m glad it touched a nerve. I realized after publishing that there were small editing needs, so I apologize for it’s being rough around the edges.
One of the problems with not having an honest and complete investigation (families of those who died called it a “whitewash”) is so many technical issues have remained for other experts to work through all with minimal evidence to work with to confirm or deny a given theory. In the case of the thermate used, there was rubble from the “pile” that was tested by a professor at Brigham Young University who found the presence of thermate, an incindiary. Luckily, we have had many more experts who have some forward to help point out important elements to the official story that are either highly improbable or outright impossible. It isn’t just one or two things, but many things.
The Pentagon is one such example. I only touched on a few issues. There is the size hole, which was made by a craft that was smaller in diameter than the Boeing that was alleged to have gone in. Photos of the intention wreckage show clearly an engine feature that was not even made by Boeing on their engines. There is no real footage of any object seen flying into the building. All footage was either hidden or confiscated from surrounding camera sources on that day. Why would anyone want to hide the full footage when we saw two other planes fly into two other buildings on that day? Additionaly, what many don’t realize is the presence of photos that were taken in the first hour of the Pentagon strike. These photos clearly show an absence of airplane debris, debris that then shows us, as if by magic, outside the Pentagon which then gets picked up (as if it’s proof that a plane hit and not a missile or smaller plane), which appears more likely based on current evidence. Then there is the turn that the Boeing was said to have made, described by seasoned pilots as impossible for a pilot who only ever flew a Cessna and only flew larger planes on a simulator, a maneuver that was difficult if not impossible for a seasoned pilot to make. And despite this, people need tovwant to believe the official narrative perhaps because the alternative is just too hard to contemplate.
I think the problem comes down to our believing our government would never lie to us, a deep need to cleave to the power of an outside authority. The problem is that all authentic knowledge starts with conferring with the authority within first. What isn’t well understood about this is that once consciousness is clarified and our beliefs shatteredby awakening (sometimes) we are in a much better place to listen to the heart. It is here that I have found that I have an ability to always discern between truth and falsehood. This is why Yogi Bahjahn described the awakened person as “dangerous.” This was because it was very hard to lie to such a person and not have that person know (or better, feel) that something being said is not true.
The elephant in the room is that once an operation like this has been executed successfully, it means more like them will occur. They might not be about airplanes but it might be something completely different…some other fake threat in order to justify hijacking our freedom, or rushing us into war.